Ask a teacher where their evenings go and lesson planning is high on the list. Not the teaching — the paperwork around it: writing measurable objectives, sequencing activities so they fit the period, deciding what to set for homework, and planning for the students who will finish early and the ones who will struggle. It is necessary work, and it is slow. We wanted to give teachers a strong first draft of it in a minute, and then get out of the way.
A full plan from three choices
A teacher chooses a subject, a grade, and a topic, and the AI drafts a complete lesson plan. It is not a vague outline. It includes measurable objectives, the materials needed, and a timed sequence of activities — a warm-up, guided and independent practice, an assessment, and a closure — arranged so the minutes add up to the length of the period rather than overrunning it. Homework and an assessment come with it.
Planning for the whole class, not the middle of it
Every class holds a range. The draft plans for that range on purpose, suggesting how to support students who need more scaffolding and how to extend the ones who are ready for more. This is the part most often skipped when a plan is written at nine at night, and it is exactly the part that decides whether the quieter or the quicker students are reached at all.
A week that builds on itself
A single lesson is useful; a coherent week is better. A weekly version plans a whole week as one connected sequence, where each period builds on the one before rather than sitting as five unrelated lessons that happen to share a topic. A teacher can see the arc of the week at once and adjust the shape of it before a single class is taught.
Grounded in the school's own curriculum
Where a school has uploaded its curriculum, the plan is drawn from it, so the objectives and content match what the class is actually meant to cover rather than a generic version of the topic. The plan reflects the syllabus the students will be examined on, not the AI's own idea of how the subject should be taught.
The teacher keeps the pen
None of this is handed down as final. Every part of the plan is editable — objectives, timings, activities, homework, differentiation — because the teacher knows their class and the AI does not. Once it reads the way they want, they save it and print it for the desk. The intent is narrow and deliberate: take the blank-page labour off the teacher's plate, and leave every real decision with the person who will stand in front of the room.